In the context of a technology consortium meeting, what outcomes can be achieved by requiring evidence for opinions?

Requiring evidence for opinions in a technology consortium meeting primarily leads to more objective decision-making. When members present opinions backed by data or concrete evidence, it shifts the focus from subjective viewpoints to facts and rational arguments. This process minimizes biases and personal feelings that can cloud judgment, encouraging decisions that are based on verifiable information rather than on individual preferences or emotions.

Additionally, this approach fosters a culture of accountability and encourages members to rely on insights that have a solid grounding. It helps create a framework where decisions are made through logical reasoning, ultimately supporting more informed outcomes that benefit the group as a whole. While other outcomes like better personal relations or clearer understanding of viewpoints may be facilitated indirectly by this practice, the core advantage is the enhancement of objectivity in the decision-making process.